Why do neuromyths persist?

One of the really useful things I've learned during my Master's in Applied Neuroscience is why many of the things people confidently "know" about the brain aren't actually true:
These ideas appear regularly in leadership development, education, the media (often with a lovely colourful picture of a brain scan for added authenticity!) and everyday conversation, but the evidence for them is weak, outdated or simply wrong.
So why do they persist? Partly because good myths usually contain a kernel of truth:
The problem is that nuance rarely travels as well as certainty. Neuroscience is complicated and, despite significant advances, there is still much we don't fully understand. Stories are simple, and our brains prefer simple.
This is where cognitive ease comes in. Information that is easy to understand feels more familiar, more comfortable and often more believable. An elegant myth can therefore be far more persuasive than an accurate explanation.
Ironically, understanding this may be a useful lesson neuroscience offers leaders. The challenge isn't that people believe myths, it is that all of us are susceptible to explanations that feel right whether we're talking about brains, organisations, strategy or people.
After all, many organisational myths persist for the same reasons as neuromyths. Perhaps leaders should reframe their questioning from:
"Is this true?"
To:
"Why does this feel so convincing?"
Do you find that you spend too much of your time supporting managers in your business who lack the skills, motivation or confidence to fully step up into their management role? I spent many years…